In that context, a number of circle (as made a picture by a media) talking politics 2007 in pessimism race context. Year 2007 looked into will not become better and different year. They of opinion that capital for pessimism have been fertilized better as long as 2006, whereas year 2008 which fetching of knocked over "high political fever" before General election 2009. Year 2007 viewed as by a jam in year among its his bleak 2006 and the political uncertainty 2008.
Pessimism Do not be Relevant
Of course is always made available by a reason for the pessimist. But, his/its problem non there. His/Its problem, pessimism will never become adequate capital to grab today and better tomorrow. Borrowing Norm Chomsky, "If You go into effect as if nothing; there is no opportunity for change, hence frankly You is guarantying it is true that will not there is change."
Others, pessimism very often do not too relevant for "all player". In the past, we it is true will do not willing to, like or is not, forced to become audience, whereas change delivered to all "sponsor", namely all laboring elite as if on behalf of and to we. Now, that epoch have through. From audience, our position shift to become player. Concept "sponsor" replaced by "mandate
Correctness that all elite, inclusive of our proxy in legislative institute and the public functionary which we select; choose often disregard our aspiration and importance. But, our position as mandatory cannot be replaced and discontinued. In this context, annoyed behavior elite after a fashion mirror characteristic of all their elector. After a fashion, periodically, we in fact can discontinue them.
His problem, expectation hit behavioral change of elite only is possible existed by if each and everyone make a change self quality as citizen. In context of this is, each and everyone have no chance to become audience. Is each and everyone claimed to become player in capacities of each limited all
For some people, above argument might be felt romantic. But, big civilization history prove that romantics change base on each and everyone like that's proven become competent capital to grab better tomorrow.
In that framework, a proverb recognized by a number of democratic society, Difference of among/between real pessimism and optimism attenuate. optimism is try to grab doughnut, pessimism grab his/its hole. Yes, to all player, non audience, pessimism even also become do not be relevant
Paying by installments Optimism
His/Its Problem: Is it possible that us, in Indonesia, entering 2007, fully the optimism? Provided by a reason for optimism in the middle of political swimmer and our economics is last some years? Doesn’t the optimism forced will only become solace, even a kind of effort lie own self. Displace direct answer directly consecution question of that crucial, we righteously start unloaded repeat "paradigm" we are about optimism of versus pessimism. During the time, we accustomed conceive Indonesia as a "set of big" what burden of his correction is placed full in our shoulder. We do not be accustomed to look into correction of Indonesia as result of quantifying from small industry done by a many people with the whole limitation of each
We even also accustomed look into history as saga [of] the big noise which is [in] their shoulder is Indonesia carried to many places. We do not accustomed comprehend history as people who sweat sprinkling his name is unidentified, what his amount millions of, shouldering small fraction of Indonesia as according to arena and ability limitation work each.
Happen paradigm confusion as consequence. We accustomed await big people work on behalf of and for us. We accustomed entrust future struggling of at a few/little one who we look into more than us. We even also do not accustomed pay by installments Indonesia.
As a project, agenda work, responsibility, or the demand live, Indonesia is even also felt by a weight. We is even also forced to cannot look after optimism. Pessimism even also so close to us, even do not attend as a choice, but something that do not be obviated. We accustomed buy up pessimism and, on the contrary, have never learnt to pay by installments optimism
Our footstep to year 2009 is righteously started leanly pay by installments optimism. Is true will never have the power to make better Indonesia by self. But, we can conduct repair in scale reached, in activity place arena of each. Each and everyone even also will have size measure of his/its optimism versus pessimism each.
By each to pay by installments optimism. At dot of this is optimism of not only becoming a possibility of opened but also the supply truthfully we have owned. For the man who used to mechanism work centralistic result acquirement and which instant, this idea is unbecoming of course. But, here the Indonesia problem of during reform. We accustomed manage turbulence in new era is which is resulted from by a transfer process from old ones to that newly by using old logic.
Allow me write unorthodox politics analysis to greet 2009. This a kind of invitation to leave old logic in managing turbulence come. Hopefully we can develop build strength and awareness and also grab opportunity to fetch tomorrow which more than today and better today from yesterday. fq
Pessimism Do not be Relevant
Of course is always made available by a reason for the pessimist. But, his/its problem non there. His/Its problem, pessimism will never become adequate capital to grab today and better tomorrow. Borrowing Norm Chomsky, "If You go into effect as if nothing; there is no opportunity for change, hence frankly You is guarantying it is true that will not there is change."
Others, pessimism very often do not too relevant for "all player". In the past, we it is true will do not willing to, like or is not, forced to become audience, whereas change delivered to all "sponsor", namely all laboring elite as if on behalf of and to we. Now, that epoch have through. From audience, our position shift to become player. Concept "sponsor" replaced by "mandate
Correctness that all elite, inclusive of our proxy in legislative institute and the public functionary which we select; choose often disregard our aspiration and importance. But, our position as mandatory cannot be replaced and discontinued. In this context, annoyed behavior elite after a fashion mirror characteristic of all their elector. After a fashion, periodically, we in fact can discontinue them.
His problem, expectation hit behavioral change of elite only is possible existed by if each and everyone make a change self quality as citizen. In context of this is, each and everyone have no chance to become audience. Is each and everyone claimed to become player in capacities of each limited all
For some people, above argument might be felt romantic. But, big civilization history prove that romantics change base on each and everyone like that's proven become competent capital to grab better tomorrow.
In that framework, a proverb recognized by a number of democratic society, Difference of among/between real pessimism and optimism attenuate. optimism is try to grab doughnut, pessimism grab his/its hole. Yes, to all player, non audience, pessimism even also become do not be relevant
Paying by installments Optimism
His/Its Problem: Is it possible that us, in Indonesia, entering 2007, fully the optimism? Provided by a reason for optimism in the middle of political swimmer and our economics is last some years? Doesn’t the optimism forced will only become solace, even a kind of effort lie own self. Displace direct answer directly consecution question of that crucial, we righteously start unloaded repeat "paradigm" we are about optimism of versus pessimism. During the time, we accustomed conceive Indonesia as a "set of big" what burden of his correction is placed full in our shoulder. We do not be accustomed to look into correction of Indonesia as result of quantifying from small industry done by a many people with the whole limitation of each
We even also accustomed look into history as saga [of] the big noise which is [in] their shoulder is Indonesia carried to many places. We do not accustomed comprehend history as people who sweat sprinkling his name is unidentified, what his amount millions of, shouldering small fraction of Indonesia as according to arena and ability limitation work each.
Happen paradigm confusion as consequence. We accustomed await big people work on behalf of and for us. We accustomed entrust future struggling of at a few/little one who we look into more than us. We even also do not accustomed pay by installments Indonesia.
As a project, agenda work, responsibility, or the demand live, Indonesia is even also felt by a weight. We is even also forced to cannot look after optimism. Pessimism even also so close to us, even do not attend as a choice, but something that do not be obviated. We accustomed buy up pessimism and, on the contrary, have never learnt to pay by installments optimism
Our footstep to year 2009 is righteously started leanly pay by installments optimism. Is true will never have the power to make better Indonesia by self. But, we can conduct repair in scale reached, in activity place arena of each. Each and everyone even also will have size measure of his/its optimism versus pessimism each.
By each to pay by installments optimism. At dot of this is optimism of not only becoming a possibility of opened but also the supply truthfully we have owned. For the man who used to mechanism work centralistic result acquirement and which instant, this idea is unbecoming of course. But, here the Indonesia problem of during reform. We accustomed manage turbulence in new era is which is resulted from by a transfer process from old ones to that newly by using old logic.
Allow me write unorthodox politics analysis to greet 2009. This a kind of invitation to leave old logic in managing turbulence come. Hopefully we can develop build strength and awareness and also grab opportunity to fetch tomorrow which more than today and better today from yesterday. fq
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar